Create Free Blog | Random Blog »   Report Abuse | Login   

 
May 28

Massive Win for Pawan Kumar

Bansal

The great verdict is out, and the victory has gone to Pawan Kumar Bansal’s name.
Pawan Bansal, Congress has secured  161,042  votes to emerge WINNER defeating his nearest rival Satya Pal Jain by a whopping margin of 58967 votes in a multifaceted election which included Harmohan Dhawan of Bahujan Samaj Party, and Anwarul Haque of Rashtriya Janta Dal, Janta Dal (U) and nine independents.

Though every party did their best to remain a front-runner, yet Pawan Bansal had an edge over the others right from the beginning because of his agenda. Dwelling highly on developmental plank and resolving GPA holders’ transfer policy, Bansal always remained the front-runner. Other factors that led to his victory were the Man Mohan Factor and the involving the youth on the image of Rahul Gandhi.

The rivals did not have any such agenda in their campaign. They resorted to  so low tactics and mud slinging personally of Bansal and his members of the family ;that the same was highly  disapproved by the people at large

It is pertinent to point out that Bansal has won the Chandigarh seat for the fourth time; and for the third time in a row. He had won it in 1991, lost to Mr. Jain in 1996 and 1998, and won consecutively in 1999 and 2004. Again,  Bansal had won in 2004 polling 139,880 votes while Jain had polled 94,632 votes and Dhawan only 17,762 votes.

In the Chandigarh Votes 2009: UT Chandigarh has a total electorate of 522,650. Of this, Bansal polled 161,042 votes while Jain got 102,075 and Dhawan 61,434. The remaining 11 candidates including the Rashtriya Janata Dal and the Janata Dal (U) forfeited their security deposits.

Pawan Bansal has shouldered many responsibilities in the national polity. He was Minster of State for Finance and Minister of state for Parliamentary affairs. During the campaign, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Chair Person UPA, while addressing a massive rally at Chandigarh, to elect Pawan Bansal from Chandigarh and had promised to elevate Pawan Bansal as a Cabinet Minister in the UPA Government. .

It is pertinent to point out that Chandigarh Social Welfare Council extended its total support to Pawan Bansal and its relentless campaign in the third phase southern sectors got translated into votes for him. Council shall continue to support his vision to make Chandigarh a World Class City.

Satish Chandra Sharma

General Secretary, Chandigarh Social Welfare Council,

Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
May 28


st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:Verdana; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:536871559 0 0 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} h1 {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; mso-outline-level:1; font-size:24.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; font-weight:bold;} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} span.klink {mso-style-name:klink;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;}

The Great Indian Verdict

The much awaited verdict has come and the country has reposed its faith in the Congress led UPA. UPA has already made it known that the Government shall be headed by Shri Man Mohan Singh. Smt Sonia Gandhi has reposed her faith in him to steer the country clear  from the ill effects of the economic meltdown and to ensure development takes place in the country as has been penned in the UPA manifesto,

A clear signal emerged during the elections that all who have been clamouring to be kingmakers are not favourites of the voters. People are not interested in the sloganeering and politics of blackmail. Lalu, Ram Vilas Paswan, Mayawati,Jayalalitha, Chandra Babu Naidu, BJ{, Left have been shown the ground.

UPA is in a position to make the government on its own and all those who would wish  to support it  shall be screened by the UPA and support  shall be unconditional. The voter has implied that he is interested in development taking place in the country. For this the faith has been reposed in the leadership of Dr. Man Mohan Singh.

People were wary of the disruptionist programmes of the BJP. The mud slinging campaign launched by Lal Krishan Advani terming Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh as weak Prime Minister is also backfired. Nor did Hindutva remained a forceful agenda. The people were wary of BJP progrmmes as it did not want any divide on caste or communal basis.

When in Sri Lanka and Pakistan are facing internal disturbances in their country, people feared our country would also face similar conditions if BJP is voted to power. The intelligentsia which never bothered to reach the polling booth was seen rushing to it in great numbers to put support to the agenda of the UPA.

In Chandigarh, Pawan Kumar Bansal won with a massive margin. Factors that went to favour Bansal was his stress on the development of the city and his vision of making the City World Class got the approval of the Constituents. Resolving The GPA muddle in the Cooperative House Building Societies created a favourable impact and GPA holders not only voted for Bansal but were also instrumental in getting their friends, relatives and neighbours also to Vote for him. Man Mohan factor also played a crucial role as the sikhs constitute a sizeable population in the City. The Rahul impact was also noticed. The youth Voted for Congress in bulk.

In fact the mandate has been in favour of clean and honest governance. Congress led UPA has to work in tandem with this motto. This mandate is also for a CHANGE for youth is now to play a big role under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi. BJP must learn that rhetoric alone is not going to work now. If it wants a place in the country’s polity, it should shun from the types of Varun Gandhi and Narendra Modi who have slurred the secular character of Indian Political system and also played havoc on the aspirations of Lal Krishan Advani to let him remain a “Prime Minister in Waiting” forever.

Satish Chandra Sharma

General Secretary

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council, email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail .com

email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
May 17

Chandigarh dated 17th March, 2009.

Chandigarh Administration having mooted transfer policy for transfer of the flat/share in the name of General Power of Attorney holders is acting one step forward and two steps backward. The policy has empowered the existing management committees in the societies to take action of the course of transfer.

A few of them have come forward and have taken steps whereby the flats till now standing in the names of the original allottees are being transferred in the name of the holders of the GPA. This is beig done was desired by me in my representations to the high ups of the administration and Local MP and Minister of State for Finance, Shri Pawan Kumar Bansal.

However, some black sheep management committees are yet sitting on the transfer policy and denying the transfer on the name of the GPA holder on one pretext or the other. The matter that has since been brought to the notice of the Secretary Cooperative and the RCS Chandigarh for giving directions to such of the society management to expedite the process.

This has been sought as the administration has put a cut out date i.e. 30 May for whereby societies should inform the RCS of the transfer process and change of flats on the names of the GPAs. Names of such transferees so received shall be included in the electoral list of the societies. This will enable such transferees to participate in the managing affairs of the Society. On transfer of flat in the name of the GPA he shall be eligible to vote and contest in the election to the managing bodies.

Such black sheep managing committees in the societies are either reluctant to induct new members to play shots in the society on the basis of old electoral rolls that constitute majority of allottees who have since sold flats on the GPA instrument or simply avoid process to keep the GPA holder in a hapless situation as he was earlier in.

Shocking viewpoints are advanced by such managing committees, which are against the soul of the notification of 2nd March, 2009 and are being strongly resisted by the GPAs of the respective society.

Administration should initiate immediate steps to check such societies and evolve a working solution for hassle free transfer in the societies, otherwise administration would be going one-step forward and two steps backward. Providing relief by notification (One-step forward), and taking no precautions to ensure proper implementation of the policy (two steps backwards).

Satish Chandra Sharma

General Secretary

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com

Cell: 9888 255 128

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Nov 09

Chandigarh Administration keeping in view the paucity of available land, and to promote private housing and optimum utilization of land by constructing multistoried structures, framed Chandigarh Allotment of land to cooperative Societies Scheme 1991.However while implementing the policy a sort of muddle has been created which has caused much resentment. I seek your benign intervention to address to the anomalies in the public interest.

Land to eligible cooperative housing societies under these rules was allotted on lease hold basis which was done @ Rs. 750/- PSY. However, land to societies that could not get the land allotment had to wait till 2002. In the intervening period lot of litigation was witnessed and while allotting land in 2002, the administration had hiked the allotment price from Rs. 750/- to Rs. 2850/- and land was allotted on free hold basis.

Chandigarh Housing Board was made the nodal agency to carry out the scheme, which had allotted land on chunk basis to the societies. While so doing, CHB created a muddle that was not addressed for over 12 years by the administration causing wide confusion in regard to transfer rules of the flats. The anomaly regarding the “Bar period” in 1991 rules/orders of the Chandigarh Housing Board and this was finally clarified in February 2008 to be “ five years from the date of allotment of land.

The delay on the part of the government in allotting encroachment free land to societies, the ensuing litigations in this behalf hit hard the noble
policy. Those who had registered as members started deserting the society memberships and the memberships were disposed off on the instrument of the general power of Attorney. Chandigarh Administration generously allowed registration the instruments liberally.
Owing to the anomaly of the CHB , the unsuspecting GPAs could not /did not apply/press for the transfer of the flats with the RCS. Whereas during these 12 years, while confusion on bar period prevailed, the Chandigarh Administration was allowing transfer of flats of the CHB /plots (parcels of

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax +(91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128,+91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

land) taking recourse to “The Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Lease Hold Land Tenure into Free hold Land Tenure Rules 1996”.

GPA holders in cooperative society flats were deprived of the benefit of these rules due to non issuance of the clarification by the administration on the “bar Period”. The out come of the faux pass of the CHB had been very harsh on the GPAs in the society flats. Meanwhile GPAs funds were instrumental in completing the projects in the cooperative societies.

Clarification issued by the administration on the Bar period and its announcement to allow transfer of the society flats fuelled the urge of these GPAs to get flats transferred on their names. But they were in for a bigger shock. The administration resorted to apply out dated, unrelated rules 1960 and applied these rules in isolation and announced hefty charges for such a transfer.

It appears that while issuing the orders the matter has not been got examined from the LR as advised by JSF that” these rules stand repealed and its effect on the charging of the unearned increase needs to be examined in consultation with the Law Department” The FD in over zeal wrote an order to effect “unearned increase” on GPA holders of society flats, on a day as auspicious as Independence Day, 15th August, 2008. None bothered to see that Rule 8 of the 1996 rules gives a clear mandate that at the time of transfer of the flat on the name of the GPA no “unearned increase shall be recoverable.”

That in view of Rule 8 of the “The Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Lease Hold Land Tenure into Free hold Land Tenure Rules 1996” the application of rule 8 (C) (in isolation) of the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Building Rules) 1960 and Rule 17(10)of the Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules 1973 as the case may be get highly dysfunctional, outdated, unrelated and against the very social fabric that the Chandigarh Administration claims to be weaving It appears that the provisions of 1996 Rules have escaped the attention of the competent authority while issuing orders on issue of transfer of flats on GPAs name.

Sir, Council is representing 15000 families having occupancy rights on the basis of the instrument of the General power of attorney. In each and every society, GPAs comprise from 60% to 90% of the total inhabitants. Though more in numbers and responsible for contributing the funds required in completion of the dwelling units, their status is exploited. The members who have sold the flats still play the shots in managing the affairs of the society.

In view of the above explanation it is requested that the alleged order of levying unearned increase on the transfer of flats in cooperative societies be withdrawn forthwith and thereby restore peace of minds of these 15000 families. Heads of these families are retirees and are at a fag end of their lives and are a worried lot as to what will happen to their families after they……..?

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax +(91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128,+91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

and again I have been trying to bring to the notice of the Administration that it follows the rules of Punjab and Haryana as applicable to UT while issuing orders. The adjoining states of the Punjab and Haryana have been following people friendly rules and charge nominal amount of ten thousand rupees while allowing such a transfer. Delhi High Court is on record having directed that the transfer fee in cooperative societies shall not be more than Rs. 10,000/- DHC has even directed societies to refund any excess amount charged from GPAs.

The GPA holders infact had become eligible for transfer of flats on their names but for the faux pass on the clarification of Bar period. Delay in clarification has brought miseries on these hapless persons As per allotment rules, Administration shall provide civic amenities till the door of the society. Within the four walls of the society, every thing is to be taken care of by the inhabitants for life. So they are made to bear extra costs by the society management for maintenance.

With this state affairs in view, rules were framed and it has been clearly laid in these rules that the society can issue new shares and transfer old shares. This was aimed at providing liquidity to the societies. Unearned increase, as envisaged by Chandigarh Administration, is charged no where in the country. Governments/Administrations all over the country are adopting rules that promote social justice and harmony.

I have been vehemently opposing the levy of unearned increase and have sent representations to all quarters from help to rescue the GPAs could come. Media has also highlighted our agitation and this representation is in series to seek succor for the GPAs.

This is what I want to submit to you for consideration that the rules imposing the unearned increase may be got terminated forthwith to provide succor to hapless GPA holders in cooperative societies as they are outdated, unrelated and applied in isolation In this regard if any rules require relaxation, the same may be relaxed as full powers to relax any or all rules stands vested in the Administrator UT and such relaxation shall be in public interest for promoting housing in the city.

Regards.

Satish Chandra Sharma
General Secretary,
Cell: 9888-255-128
Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 27

Dreams of GPAs turning into nightmare…

Satish Chandra Sharma M.A. (Eco), Delhi.

The dream of 15000 GPA holders of General Power of Attorney in the city’s cooperative house building societies is turning into nightmare thanks to the dilatory tactics of the Chandigarh Administration on transfer of flats on their names, vis-à-vis the people friendly rules followed by states of Punjab, Haryana and Delhi.

The societies had been in a long drawn battle for decades with the Chandigarh Administration to get land allotted to them. Meanwhile Chandigarh Housing Board had been earning interest running into several crores on the initial amounts deposited by the societies.

During the intervening period the rate of land to be allotted to these societies had been raised from Rs. 750/- PSY to Rs. 2500/-.Protests were lodged against this discriminatory increase. An option was also given to these societies to get land allotted on free hold on payment of Rs. 350/- PSY. This was opted by practically every society. Though this was after inordinate delay in allotment of land.
In a major relief to General power attorney (GPA), group housing societies, the Chandigarh administration provided a reprieve by reducing lock in period of sale of flats from five years of completion to five years from allotment of land. Though this was an error corrected. Transfer of flats seemed to become a reality.
However, the demon of administration appeared on the scene and while a policy document was to be drafted to give relief to the holders of GPA, an unprecedented charge was sought to levied taking recourse to rules, Byelaws and Act that were remotely connected with the process. The administration under RTI has furnished that it is taking recourse to Rule 8-C of the Chandigarh Sale of Sites and buildings Rules 1960 and Rule 17 (10) of Chandigarh Lease hold sites Rules 1973 as the case may be, is one thing which I have been vehemently opposing.
An amount of one third “unearned increase (difference between allotment price and market price)”has been sought to be recovered from the GPA subject to condition that the buyer is eligible for holding a residential property in the city under the provisions of the cooperative Act. Society shall obtain occupation certificate on making full payment for the land after completion of the dwelling units as per the lay out plan.
The transfer policy notified by the Chandigarh did not catch the fancy of the GPAs and earned ire of all and sundry. Chandigarh Social Welfare Council took up the issue. Council termed it as violative of the rules, byelaws governing the Chandigarh Allotment of Land to Cooperative Societies Scheme 1991. This, I strongly believe, has led to simply defeating the very purpose of the notification.
I am at loss to understand the justification of the finance department of Chandigarh as to how a free hold property can attract an unearned increase? The contradiction lies in the simple fact that the administration has adopted two different modes of allotment of land to societies. One being leasehold allotment and the other the free hold. Administration is at a confused end and it is arbitrarily applying one set of rules which end up in chaos. How can one justify application of rules that were framed for lease hold societies on properties allotted on free hold? How can one justify application of old rules when new rules have been framed in 1996 making eligible CHB flat owners as well as other categories of properties to convert from lease hold to free hold even during barred period? Cooperative societies, allotted land on lease hold tenure are one such category of property made eligible for conversion under these 1996 rules. Has the administration ever made any announcement on the modalities to be followed in such cases? No the administration is content at causing a muddle.
The muddle seems to have been created by the handiwork of all those related with the subject. On one hand administration agrees to convert the lease hold flats/plots into free hold under the 1996 rules, which rules absolve the transferee to pay any unearned increase. Then it allots land on free hold basis and for transfer of free hold flats instead of Rule 8-C of 1996(which absolve the transferee of any unearned increase) rules applies rule 8-C of 1960 (having provision of 33% unearned increase for permission to transfer during the barred period) after the lock in period has elapsed.
The opinion of the Ld. RCS, who opined that the transfer of the flats in the society flats should attract only a small sum as transfer fee has been ignored obviously because of the muddle created by babus of the finance department. The fact of the matter is that the administration is resorting to apply rules which were framed for lease hold properties that it is erroneously applying on free hold property.
Another faux pass of the administration is its adamancy to apply rules from its archive that have been superceded by law/rules on the same subject. Like Rules of 1960 especially sub rule 8-C should get replaced by Rule 8-C of 1996 By doing so, administration would stand to get corrected of all the anomalies it is committing on the issue of the transfer of the society flats on the names of the GPA.
Pertinent questions relevant here are: Did the administration charge any unearned increase while giving its consent for substitution of the members (who in fact were GPA holders) @ Rs. 50,000/-, Rs. 35000/- , Rs. 25000/- of Category A, B, C flats in Universal Society? Or did the administration invoke the cited rules while allowing New Light Society to sell two flats in the open auction?
Satish Chandra Sharma,
General Secretary, Chandigarh Social Welfare Council,
Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com
Cell: 9888-255-128.

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 24

Property Ownership by a GPA in Chandigarh

The Property owned by a General Power of Attorney at Chandigarh is the culmination of the stringent rules and their application by the “Babucracy” of the Chandigarh Administration. Though the Chandigarh Housing Board has changed with the times allowing Transfer of CHB flats in a hassle free manner, administration’s ‘ babucracy’ is riding high on the ‘beurocracy’ by giving faulty noting while a decision is to be taken. Until now, the transfer of CHB flats in Chandigarh was based on the general power of attorney.

The Chandigarh Administration too has agreed to regularize the occupancy rights of the holders of the General Power of Attorney but this comes with a price due to levying of outdated, unrelated rules applied in isolation. Administrative structure being such, the officer sitting at the helm of the affairs goes by the noting and declares ‘the policy decision’

Such policy decisions lead the sufferers to courts for justice. Courts overburdened with work are unable to dispense justice immediately and the matter hangs fire for long times. The Policy mooted for optimum utilization of available land for construction of flats through eligible cooperative housing societies to its members also got caught in the web of litigation for clearing land of encroachments, allotment to cooperative societies. Lot of water had flown under the bridge till construction of the DUs was commences.

The members who had registered some two decades had found alternative housing arrangements. The memberships had no value for such members. They wished to part with this. The error introduced by the CHB regarding transfer of such flats caused confusion. Whereas statutory rules provided for a transfer five after the land was allotted to the society, CHB introduced the provision as reading five after the completion of the flats constructed by the society.

Societies feeling the finance crunch in executing their projects stood with open arms to welcome some one who would be instrumental in providing the necessary funds. The administration on its part allowed registration of the General power of attorney in favour of persons willing to have a dwelling unit. This registration of GPAs went unchecked, unabated.

Then GPAs started getting to problems. The management of the societies that had welcomed the GPAs with open arms had gone on back foot. These GPAs started getting treatment as second class citizens for they could not participate in the day to day functioning of the societies nor were treated at par with the allottee members. Many tactics were adopted to fleece the GPAs of their money. Those who had sold their flats on the power of attorney were still playing the shots in the management of the societies.

Irked with this behaviour I had for the first time made an attempt to form a Residents Welfare Association. In my area. The management of the society in league with officers of the cooperative department got the formation of the RWA banned. Adding fuel to the fire, the administration stopped the registration of the GPAs by a verbal order, causing wide resentment.

Representations to UT Administrator evoked no response. Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson UPA, Prime Minister Man Mohan Singh. Home Minister Shiv Raj Patil were approached to intervene urging that the administration is busy clearing mega projects haste and issues of public interest continue to hand fire, regularization of GPAs being one.

Information sought by me under the RTI Act 2005, confirmed that the administration is hell bent to apply rule 8 (C) of Chandigarh Sale of Site and Building Rules 1960 in isolation, which is legally void. Rule 17 (10) sought to be applied related to societies that have been allotted land on lease hold system. Such societies have been given option to convert from lease hold to free hold under the Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Leasehold Land tenure into Freehold Land Tenure Rules 1996.

The rules are highly ambiguous, whereas under these rules neither a flat allotted by the CHB nor a plot owner who was allotted parcel of land through the cooperative society attract unearned profit clause after converting from leasehold to free hold, the societies that have been allotted land on chunk basis on free hold basis are being targeted for payment of this unearned increase. Also no mechanism has been evolved to facilitate conversion of lease hold into free hold under the 1996 Rules. Completion certificates to many of these societies has been denied due to violations caused by individuals. A large section is suffering on this account.

Now when Chandigarh Housing Board CHB has categorically said that GPA holders will no longer be eligible to apply for flats in any of its residential project schemes. Residential property, say board officials, must go to the shelter-less people. Why can’t the administration regularize the existing GPAs on the pattern of people friendly rules of Haryana and Punjab? Introduce further a mutual transfer policy which will bring buyers and sellers face to face for the first time and eliminate the role of middlemen like property dealers. The move will also end the nexus between property dealers and officials by allowing genuine buyers and sellers to own property in a legal way.

Such a Policy shall bring revenue to Chandigarh Administration as transactions would involve the payment of transfer fee and other prescribed charges. Until now, such transfer fee and other charges are being evaded in the name of large scale sale and purchase of flats through GPA. The new policy will protect the financial interests of Administration.

Such a policy if adopted shall go a long way in developing the housing sector and the administration shall stand true to its stand of caring the residents.

Satish Chandra Sharma
General Secretary.
Chandigarh Social Welfare Council (Regd)
Cell: 9888-255-128.
Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com
Link: http://schandrai.blog.co.in

.

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 16

When will GPAs be heard?

General Power of Attorney holders are a class that has contributed the maximum in the run up to the completion of the Flats in group housing cooperative societies yet remain at a receiving end both at the hands of the management committees of these societies and the administration of the city.

Original allottees in the GHSs have moved away from the scene by selling their shares yet are allowed to play shots through the faulty rules. The administration rather than addressing the problem by regularizing the holders of instrument of GPA is playing in the hands of management committee. The leftover numbers of allottees do not want to lose control over the affairs of the societies and, therefore, prefer to build a nexus with official machinery.

Those who have sold their interest and title on GPA are still invited to participate in the election to the management committees. Allurements are aplenty. Whereas Delhi Government has amended rules that those who have sold their title, interest, share in the society on GPA are barred from participation in the working of the society, the Chandigarh Administration still let them mingle in the affairs. What could be more pitiable than this? Rather than doing away with the evil, the administration is a party to promote this nepotism.

Now, where should the hapless GPA go to be heard? Nexus between the RCS and the management committee is hampering the rightful regularization of the GPAs. Heavy charges for the transfer have been mooted to be recovered from them. The GPA who has unnecessarily been burdened with the hefty transfer charges for getting the flat transferred on his name is miffed at this attitude of the administration.

Please join me to take this fight against injustice heaped on GPAs. United we shall be able to put pressure on the administration not to treat the GPA a second class resident of the society complex he lives in and till then we shall not relax……….Satish Chandra Sharma, General Secretary, Chandigarh Social Welfare Council, Chandigarh. Mobile 9888-255-128. Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com. Link: http://schandrai.blpg.co.in

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 12

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax + (91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128, +91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Most Respected Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji, Dated: 13th October,2008

Save Our Souls. Immediate Intervention by you requested to rescue 15000 families.

I would like to draw your kind attention to our representation dated 22nd September, 2008 seeking your kind intervention in the matter of regularizing the General Power of Attorney holders in Cooperative House Building societies at Chandigarh.

This is again to apprise you of the harrowing tale of the holders of the instrument of General Power of Attorney in the Cooperative Group Housing Society flats at Chandigarh and to request you to direct the Chandigarh Administration to address this problem and resolve the issue in the light of Judgments of the Courts and the rules in this regard followed by Delhi, Haryana and Punjab.

Chandigarh Administration has maintained a studied silence on the subject and is plainly disinterested in having a dialogue on the subject with the Council. Our Memorandums to Administrator UT have received scant attention. This is causing wide resentment in the minds of the GPA holders.

Though time and again we have pointed out that the rules being sought to be applied in this case have been outdated, unrelated and applied in isolation yet the Administration has preferred to maintain a studied silence. UPA government has given to every citizen a right to seek information on any subject under the RTI, shouldn’t the administration on its own issue a clarification on a subject that 15000 families are agitating against? Can an administration under a democratic set be allowed to act on its own and its babu’s whims and fancies?

Chandigarh Administration has collected 1000s of crores of rupees by way of Development charges and has given land on chunk basis to Cooperative Societies to be developed and maintained for life by them. In so doing the administration is causing discrimination as all sectors which the Chandigarh Housing Board has developed, it provides all civic amenities and bears their maintenance. To end this discrimination, administration may be directed to develop mechanism to dissolve the cooperative society once allotment of flats is done and handover the management to RWA which have larger mandate and represent all This is the worldwide trend that a cooperative ceases to exist after allotment.

I would, therefore, again in the light of what has been stated, humbly submit that the Chandigarh Administration may be directed to roll back order of the finance department, disdainfully made on 15th August, 2008 and immediately allow transfer of flats on the names of the GPAs where it has allotted land on free hold basis and allow conversion from leasehold to free hold society flats for which rules exist for their eventual transfer as on the free hold allotments.

Immediate intervention by your good self will also improve the prospects of our Member Parliament, Shri Pawan Kumar Bansal, MOS Finance, among 15000 GPA holder families who solemnly believe that he has been nurturing the Chandigarh Constituency so well.

With kind regards

Yours truly,

Satish Chandra Sharma,
General Secretary,
Cell: 9888-255-128
Email: sharma.ambakripa@gmail.com

Ref: CSWC GS/R-SG/10/08

Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson,
UPA
10, Jan path, New Delhi..

.

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 11

Demand to roll back the order of Finance Department.

 

Satish Chandra Sharma, General Secretary of the Chandigarh Social Welfare Council has represented before the Administrator U.T. Chandigarh seeking regularization of the GPAs in the Cooperative Housing Societies. We had the honor to place before the administrator our detailed submission in our memorandum dated 14 August, 2008, on how the Chandigarh Administration is relying on outdated, unrelated rules applied in isolation in the case of those who are having occupancy rights through the instrument of General Power of Attorney.

 

We had sought his kind intervention in the matter in the hope that he would direct the Administration to take cognizance of the rules, especially The Punjab Cooperative Act 1961 (as applicable to UT  …Chandigarh) and rules and practices being followed in adjoining states of Haryana and Delhi.

 

However we find this is not be. Council is in possession of a copy of the order of the finance department, ironically, made on the auspicious day of Independence Day, 15th August, 2008 stating “And whereas the Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh after carefully examining” the demand to annul charge of “unearned increase on such transfers from the members and for the removal of the condition of obtaining completion certificate of the Society………………………….    is unable to accede to their   request”

 

Council had to resubmit that the view of the Administration of not judicious. The administration should have taken cognizance of its own consensual agreement as defendants that it had submitted in the matter of CWP 10691 of 2005 and CWP of 2006 both decided on 21.08.2006 .Administration  had consented a consensual transfer charges fixed at Rs. 50,000/- for Category A, Rs. 35,000/- for Category B , and Rs. 25000/- for Category C . Nowhere the administration brought the rule being applied now in the knowledge of the Hon’ble High Court. Should we infer that the applicability of the rules shall be governed by the fancy of the officer dealing a case of law/rule.?

 

We have also brought to the notice of the Administrator that Delhi Government in a bid to regularize the GPAs had even amended the principal Act in respect of Cooperative Societies  and substituted a new section 91 vide notification No. F-14 (33) LA on 2.12.2006 and has also taken cognizance of the order of the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court inter alia which directed that the transfer fee for the regularization of the GPA shall not exceed Rs. 10,000/-.Even, Shri R.K. Rao, Registrar Cooperative Societies, Chandigarh seems reconciled to this view and opined likewise citing the case of Haryana.

 

We fervently appeal to Administrator UT Chandigarh to direct the Chandigarh Administration to de-notify the order of Finance department issued by Shri Sanjay Kumar IAS, Finance Secretary on the auspicious day of Independence, 15th August 2008 and provide relief to the GPAs by regularizing them in consonance of rules being followed in Punjab as applicable to UT, Chandigarh, Rules of Haryana and Delhi which provide for the regularization of the GPA by charging nominal fee.

 

Satish Chandra Sharma

General Secretary,

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council,

Email: sharma.ambakripa#gmail.com

Link http://schandrai.blog.co.in

 

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Oct 11

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax +(91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128,+91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Housing in any city anywhere in the world is something that is most cherished by people. By Satish Chandra Sharma, M.A.
Housing in any city anywhere in the world is something that is most widely cherished by people and Chandigarhians are no different. When affordable housing schemes were launched by the Chandigarh Administration, it got tremendous response. However, the gains that could accrue were lost under the drain owing to administration’s apathy in formulating, implementing the schemes. On more than one occasion, people were forced to approach the High Courts to seek justice.

The history was replicated in each and every scheme that the administration launched. So while implementing the scheme of 1991 for allotment of land to Cooperative house building societies for further allotment to their members by constructing Dwelling Units (DUs). The land to societies was allotted on lease hold basis. Whereas statutory rule allowed transfer of such dwellings five years after the allotment of land to the society. Chandigarh Housing Board, a nodal agency of the administration, incorporated this rule to read five years after the completion of the DUs

For years together, this anomaly was not corrected and innocent occupiers of these DUs, remained on the suffering side. When this was noticed by those who knew the statutory rules, the anomaly was corrected and presented in the form of a relief to occupiers of the DUs.

As a fall out of the High Court directions, the societies were asked to complete deposit of earnest money of 25% @ Rs. 750/- PSY But before any of these societies were allotted land, the rate of land was refixed @2500/- P.S.Y. on lease hold basis and @ 2850/- P.S.Y. for free-hold basis in 2000. The 61 remaining societies were asked to complete 25% E.M. at the revised rate. Presently, 57 societies were to be allotted land on free-hold basis. The Chandigarh Administration has allocated 63.436 acres of land to 31 societies in Sec-48, 49 & 51. This was widely resented.

The administration failed to respond to the fact that while it had accepted earnest money @ Rs. 750/-, it was now asking for more money from them to make them eligible for allotment of land. This, societies alleged, was discriminatory as they could not be charged the new rate after payment of earnest money several years ago

Another factor that was hampering allotment of land was that the land stood encroached upon, which it had to clear to facilitate allotment to societies, which was eventually done in the year 2002. The land to such societies was allotted on free hold basis. Ironically

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax +(91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128,+91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Administration failed to notice the fact that when land is allotted on free hold, the transfer of interest and title is “unfailing inalienable, and total” It continued to feel and act as a lessor of the land, which is legally void. Without any iota of doubt, such allottees were subject to certain laws/rules that related to construction as per master plan. It was here that the administration grossly erred. It moved a policy to allow transfer of flats on the names of the GPAs on payment of an “unearned increase”. This was sought when lock in period for allowing transfers has already elapsed. Neither the administration bothered to see as to how it could charge any unearned increase on DUs for which land was allotted on free hold basis?. And why it did not evolve a criterion of allowing conversion of leasehold flats to free hold as was done in case of Chandigarh Housing Board Flats.?

Whereas The Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Lease Hold Land Tenure into free hold Land Tenure Rules, 1996, allowed conversion from lease hold to free hold to holders of parcels of land in cooperative societies and the flats of the Chandigarh Housing Board on nominal charges, as prescribed in the rules, such a provision was not applied to occupiers of the Society flats. These people were subjected to discrimination owing to faulty acts of the Chandigarh Housing Board which had changed the statutory rule of transfer from five years from allotment of land to 5 years from the date of completion.

And whereas violations created by allottees/GPAs were not taken into account while transferring a flat, norm of completion certificates was faithfully enshrined on the societies. Many were denied grant of completion certificates on this very count. Such societies shall suffer in silence. Violations caused by individuals were compounded on all.

And there is no end to the miseries of the holders of the general power of attorney. Despite mooting of a policy on the substitution, and grant of power to the General Bodies of the Societies to allow such substitutions in the society. Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana had directed substitution on payment of Rs. 50,000/-, Rs.35000/-, Rs. 25000/- for category A, B, C members of the society.

And while rules authorize the societies to issue new shares and transfer old shares, it is beyond simple comprehension as to how the administration can lord over the authority granted to societies under rules. Neither the administration has ever explained as to which specific rules it is making resort to justify the levy of unearned profit. Avenues do exist, whereby rules could be made people friendly in a broader perspective of “Administration

Chandigarh Social Welfare Council

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office: # 194-C, Sector 51-A, Chandigarh Fax +(91)172-504-5151 Cell: +91-9888-255-128,+91-9872-087200 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Of the people, by the people and for the people” and it should have moulded its actions likewise.

It is high time of the intelligentsia, media, and even judiciary to introspect on the issue and come out boldly to rescue hapless holders of the GPAs in cooperative house building societies. I repeat such introspection by people who can impact the wrong doing of the administration is the only hope besides intervention by Home Ministry.

Satish Chandra Sharma,
General Secretary. Chandigarh Social Welfare Council
Res.cum off: # 1605, Progressive Society, Sector 50-B, Chandigarh
Phone 0172-4659064, Cell: 9888-255-128
Link: http://schandrai.blog.co.in

Share SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend 
Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio.
All rights reserved. http://schandrai.blog.co.in | Powered by Blog.co.in